Basel Problem:Using Resolution Into Factors

Author

Abhirup Moitra

Published

July 5, 2023

Leonard Euler’s calculational prowess was remarkable, including his work in the area of infinite series. His methods are not covered in this article, but we will state and prove one of his famous results. We know the series converges and we’ll show how to prove that. But the problem of determining its exact value is quite difficult. The problem was known as the Basel problem, named after Basel University in Switzerland, and Euler solved it in 1735 when he obtained a surprising result that n=11n2=π26. He also described a process to derive the values of the series with higher even power of 1n. For example, he showed that n=11n4=π490 and n=11n6=π6945. However, the values of the corresponding series of odd powers of 1nwere not discovered and stay elusive to the present day.

Convergence of n=11n2

Approach 1

Observe thatn=11n2convergent iffn=21n2convergent.

Note that;01n21n2n=1n11n

From the Comparison test, we know that if {xn}n1 and {yn}n1be real sequences and for somekNwe have,0xnynnkthen,

The convergence ofynimplies the convergence ofxn.

By comparison test, n=21n2nconvergent impliesn=21n2converges.

yn=1n2n=1n11n

limNn=2yn

=limNn=2(1n11n)

=limN[(1112)+(1213)+(1314)++(1N1N1)]

=limN[11N]=1

n=2yn=n=21n2nconverges to1.Hencen=21n2is convergent.

n=11n2is convergent.

Approach 2

Since some partial sums are monotone, it suffices to show that some sub-sequences of {sk} is bounded. If k1:=211=1, then sk1=1. If k2:=221=3, then

sk2=11+(122+132)<1+222=1+12

and if k3:=231=7, then we have

sk3=sk2+(142+152+162+172)<sk2+442<1+12+122

By mathematical induction, we find that if kj:=2j1, then

0<skj<1+12+(12)2++(12)j1

Since the term on the right is a partial sum of a geometric series with r=12, it is dominated by 1112=2. But we know that, if {xn} is a sequence of non-negative real numbers. Then the series xn converges iff the sequence {sk} of partial sums are bounded. In this case,

n=1xn=lim(sk)=sup{sk:kN}

This implies that n=11n2 is convergent.

Resolution Into Factors

Resolve sinθ Into Factors

Here our goal is to express sinθ as an infinite product i.e.,

sinθ=θr=1(1θ2r2π2)=θ(1θ2π2)(1θ222π2)(1θ232π2)

Proof

We have,

sinA=2sinA2cosA2=2sinA2sinπ+A2(1)

then,

sinθ=2sinθ2sinπ+θ2(2)

Substituting θ2 and π+θ2 for A successively in the formula (1), we get,

sinθ2=2sinθ22sin2π+θ22

and

sinπ+θ2=2sinπ+θ22sin3π+θ22

Putting these values in the right side of (2) and re-arranging them, we have

sinθ=23sinθ22sinπ+θ22sin2π+θ22sin3π+θ22(3)

Similarly, substituiting θ22,π+θ22,2π+θ22,3π+θ22 for A successively in (1) and putting these values in the right side of (3) and re-arranging them, we get

sinθ=27sinθ23sinπ+θ23sin2π+θ23sin7π+θ23 sinθ=2231sinθ23sinπ+θ23sin2π+θ23sin(231)π+θ23

=.....................................

=.

=2p1sinθpsinπ+θpsin2π+θpsin(p1)π+θp

Therefore,

sinθ=2p1sinθpsinπ+θpsin2π+θpsin(p1)π+θp(4)

where p=2n. The last factor in (4) is sin(p1)π+θp

sin(p1)π+θp=sin(ππθp)=sin(πθp)

The last but one factor in (4) is sin(p2)π+θp

sin(p2)π+θp=sin(π2πθp)=sin(2πθp)

, and so on. The (12p+1)th factor from the beginning

sin(12pπ+θp)=sin(π2+θp)=cosθpHence combining the second and the last factors, the third and the last but one, and so on, and leaving alone the first and (12p+1)th factors which have no conjugates, the equation (4) becomes

sinθ=2p1sinθp{sin2πpsin2θp}{sin22πpsin2θp}{sin2(12p1)πpsin2θp} cosθp

(5)

sinθsinθp={sin2πpsin2θp}{sin22πpsin2θp}{sin2(12p1)πpsin2θp} cosθp

(6)

Let θ0, then limθ0(sinθθsinθpθp)p=p,limθ0sinθp=0 andlimθ0cosθp=1. Thus equation (6) becomes

p=2p1sin2πpsin22πpsin2(12p1)πp(7)

Dividing (5) by (7), we get

sinθ=psinθp cosθp{1sin2θpsin2πp}{1sin2θpsin22πp}

Now, let p; then limp(psinθp)=limp(sinθpθp).θ=θ;limpcosθp=1

limpsin2θpsin2πp=[sinθpθpsinπpπp]2.θ2π2=θ2π2,and so on.

Hence,

sinθ=θ(1θ2π2)(1θ222π2)(1θ232π2)

i.e., sinθ=θr=1(1θ2r2π2)(Proved)

The Basel Problem

The Basel problem asks for the precise summation of the reciprocals of the squares of the natural numbers, i.e. the precise sum of the infinite series. The sum of the series is approximately equal to 1.644934.

Prove that, 112+122+132+=π26 i.e., n=11n2=π26

sinθ=θ θ33!+θ35!=θ(1θ26+θ4120)

We have also, sinθ=θ(1θ2π2)(1θ222π2)(1θ232π2)

Therefore,

θ(1θ26+θ4120)=θ(1θ2π2)(1θ222π2)(1θ232π2)

1(θ26θ4120+)=(1θ2π2)(1θ222π2)(1θ232π2)

Taking logarithms of both the sides, we get

ln[1(θ26θ4120+)]=ln(1θ2π2)+ln(1θ222π2)+ln(1θ232π2)+

(θ26θ4120+)12(θ26θ4120+)2

=(θ2π212θ4π4)+(θ222π212θ424π2)+(θ232π212θ434π4)

()

Equating the co-efficients of θ2 from the both sides of this identity, we have

16=12π2+1222π2+123π2+

112+122+132+=π26

Therefore, n=11n2=π26

Illustration

From the L.H.S of the identity () we get

(θ26θ4120+)12(θ26θ4120+)2

=(θ26θ4120+)[1+12(θ26θ4120+)+ ]

=(θ26θ4120+)[1+θ212θ4240+ ]

=(θ26θ472+)

Therefore, the identity () can be expressed as,

(θ26θ472+)=(θ2π212θ4π4)+(θ222π212θ424π2)+

(θ232π212θ434π4) ()

Again, equating the coefficients of θ4 from the both sides of the identity () and () we get

12π4(114+124+134+)=1120+172=1180

114+124+134+=π490

Therefore, n=11n4=π490

So, we are done. This is all about Basel Problem. We are leaving the n=11n6=π6945 solution for inquisitive reader. If reader is interested they can solve this.

See Also

Basel problem

On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude

Weierstrass factorization theorem

References